Archive for December, 2006

Bangs & Whimpers: White Flag in the War on Terror?

Wednesday, December 13th, 2006

Elaborating a key motif of my writings since summer 2001 my next book will explain that the “war on terror” is part of a long-running war on the Jews. Recent events support this thesis.

The steady leakage from the Report of the Iraq Study Group culminating in its release and the spin-off of its CIA member, Robert Gates to be Secretary of Defense signal that America’s perennial diplomatic-intelligence-corporate leaders are straining to strike our colors in the War on Terror. Like the UN, the shadows behind our throne suggest we talk with the house of Asad and the forerunner of the Mahdi. We will talk; they will laugh, and then some…

They profess a rational policy based on “diplomacy” with a regional power that publicly flaunts denial of the holocaust while promising another one, imminently; — either right before or right after the “hidden Imam” Mahdi Hussein pops from his well to ignite Armageddon. 

Can we talk…..  (more…)

The Baker, the Butcher and the Joker

Sunday, December 10th, 2006

The release of the Iraq Study Group (ISG) Report on December 06 made clear that James A. Baker III was taking a cleaver to American resistance to jihad. The group’s recommendations have been pushed fervently. Adopting Baker’s proposals would be like throwing meat to sharks. It is certain, perhaps intentionally, to ignite widespread and devastating conflagrations.

The main joker in this deck is its proposal that America join the jihadist regime in Iran in a dialog that, according to Baker’s “blue ribbon panel” would help us disengage painlessly from Mesopotamia and bring peace to the region. Closing our eyes to Shiite apocalyptic dogmas and the imperatives of jihad, the central tenet of Islam as Ibn Hazim explained in the 13th century, Baker proposes giving the Butchers of Middle East virtually everything they want, — at Israel’s expense: the Golan Heights to Syria; a “Palestinian” terror state carved forthwith from Israel’s heartland; millions of Arabs “return” to their ostensible homes in Israel. Israel ceases to exist, America faces un-buffered jihad.

The Saudis and Mahdi, Sunnis and Shiites, rejoice. America loses its truest and most valuable ally and the region loses its economic engine and oasis of civilization. Peace and prosperity strike again. And all this will reinforce the impulse to sectarian violence, to violence for its own sake (study the Shiite cult of flagellation) that have led Baker’s Carlyle group to prosper. During the “War on Terror” their assets have grown from $1.3 to $12.5 billion. The group, termed, a revolving door from US government service to employ as lobbyists for Arabian states will please the House of Saud by keeping the meat grinders in Mesopotamia and west of the Jordan going as long as possible. (more…)

Warnings from the Land of Dreams and “The Land of Wishes”

Tuesday, December 5th, 2006

America is getting a new Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates who has signaled the intentions of our diplomatic establishment toward Iran’s war of terror (threats of annihilation) which is directed most openly against Israel, for now.

Mr. Gates has shown that he can be as obtuse as the Senators snoring through pro forma confirmation questions. He agrees with Senators that Iran is pursuing atomic weapons capabilities and that its leaders are lying about this development, — no kidding. More importantly, he stated that no one, certainly not he who only is the new civilian head of the Armed Forces of America can provide assurance that Israel will not be nuked by Iran. That’s called an open invitation. He also claimed that its atomic program is “a deterrent against nuclear powers surrounding it, Pakistan in the east, Russia in the north, Israel to the West and us [America] in the Persian Gulf.” More...

Perhaps this fellow should be working for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Perhaps he is, or will be on their payroll, as the firm of Baker, Bott is of Saudi Arabia.

Mr. Gates added that America would “respond” to an Iranian nuclear attack “only if our critical interests are endangered, and then only as a last resort.” The Senators were too servile to ask if a strong Israel was “a critical interest” of the United States. Perhaps the answer is too ugly: it’s critical that Israel be beaten into submission, — or destroyed – to please the religion of peace and its well-paid friends. And it is increasingly clear that our diplomats our building Iran into the regional superpower, another star in the multi-power world order: it looks to be a very violent one… (more…)