War and Culture

Let’s focus on a few things said and unsaid in the State of the Union address of 2007. The speech, the entire gesamtkunstwerk of the evening represents a few steps further down that line of proud and grim monarchs quoted from The Magician’s Nephew in my recent essay on israelendtimes.com.

According to Mr. Bush, what happened in the Middle East during 2005 was that the Iraqi [sic] people made great strides toward freedom; various people in the Lebanon sought to organize a ‘democracy’ in that other artificial nation; and moderate Arab states help us. What did not happen, officially, during 2005 was that, under the reiterated instructions of the American State Department (which runs by its own agenda about which Mr. Bush is occasionally briefed so he can comment for the media) the client government in Jerusalem uprooted ten thousand Jews from their homes, farms and communities in Gush Katif and northern Samaria so that they could be replaced by jihadists. Thus the War on Terror will be extended, as Mr. Bush said, long after we have turned the reigns of leadership over to others.

That’s the plan; it’s a war of attrition, a means of population control in the familiar and the literal sense. Please recall, Secretary of State ‘Jadis’ C. Rice stated that “there could be no greater legacy for America than to help create a Palestinian State.”

That this is a prime good of American foreign policy also was clear in the President’s brief overview of the spread of terrorism in 2006 (he means Islamic jihad). There were terrible attacks and violence between Shiite and Sunni extremists in “Iraq,” why, even a great Shiite holy place in Samara was attacked. (We thought Muslims were allowed to attack holy sites). The regime in Iran is supporting terrorism and with Syria had arranged the murder of Pierre Gemayal in the Lebanon, as it had with Rafik Harari and Bashir Gemayel in 1983. And, he added, Hizbollah “ignited broader conflict in the region.”

How sweet: Israel’s semi-official new name is “the region.” It will elide smoothly into the “New Middle East” long planned by the policy shapers of Britain as a key part of the imperial federalism projected by Cecil Rhodes and the large group of colleagues, media (the London Times) and organizations (The Round Table, The Royal Institute of International Affairs) that survived him. Jews will work, invent, build, feed, heal and protect others, exporting technology everywhere and they will die protecting the death of Jewish sovereignty within a world security state or, as Julian Huxley, first director of UNESCO called it, “a regionalized world system.”

“The region” is code: what the President meant but didn’t say (because his speech writers didn’t write it) is that Hizbollah attacked Israel for five weeks with rocket barrages, more strikes than all the V-I and V-2 rockets Germany shot on England in a year of WW II. Hundreds of thousands of Jews had to flee their homes and live in shelters. We already have discussed the reason this was not a “humanitarian crisis” – Jews are not human. As a British official explained in 1948, “Israel is not a state and therefore cannot be invaded.” Some things never change.

And in regard to negative developments in 2006, Hamas was not mentioned. That leaves the State Department with plenty of wiggle room to finesse the take down of Judea and Samaria and keep the “war on terror” (also known as jihad) simmering.

Given the corrupt nature of the mass media, of most of those who eat it, of the oligarchs who dance for it, of the puppet masters, jihadists and silk hats alike who run the show according to the principle, “one hand washes the other” it’s probably better for Jews that the words “Israel” and “Jewish people” were not mentioned by G.W.B. Western and Islamic Jew-haters have created a situation where a significant number of people, unable to read a map, ignorant of history think that the entire nightmare of our times is being manipulated by Jews. (That’s why Israelis can’t travel or live freely in Judea or the Shomron; that’s why Jews can’t pray on the Temple Mount, because Jews are so powerful; right).

So given the rule of the lie perhaps it was better that Israel wasn’t mentioned, except one time. The one time that that horrid word, “Israel” was mentioned was as an adjunct to that more important and beloved word, “Palestine,” embodiment of a lie as in (I paraphrase), “we remain dedicated to creating a Palestinian State to live in freedom and peace with Israel.” The fact that this state will become Judenrein, as its Arab proponents tirelessly assert, the fact that Judaism’s holiest places will be within this “Palestinian,” the fact that its residents are dedicated by religion, education and para-military training to murder Jews was not mentioned by the chief oligarch whose CIA trains the Jew killers.

Note a connection to the issue of immigration and “securing” America’s southern borders. The chief oligarch declared himself against amnesty but a supporter of “a comprehensive immigration bill” (that’s why the Democrats all got up and applauded) which includes various kinds of amnesty and continued infusion of Mexican workers, legal and illegal until America’s institutions crash and we have a genuine junta that must obey the Vatican. This is okay; but during WW II America was “too full” even to fill the quota on Jewish immigration (55,000 / year), much less to exceed it, given the circumstances. And now Judea and Samaria are “too full” of Jews (about 250,000) although its vast empty expanses, the heartland of the Jewish people are waiting for them to develop it.

In 1923, in a speech to the House of Lords, Sir Alfred Milner, de facto head of the Royal Institute for International Affairs and the Round Table seminar, media and publication consortium (funded by J.P Morgan and the Carnegie Institute as well as the Rhodes estate) conceded that Jewish areas of Palestine always would be productive and Arab areas would be a net drain, unproductive; that Jewish settlement “greatly benefitted” the Arabs. Nevertheless, he declared that “there must never be a Jewish state” and reiterated his group’s support for “an Arab federation” (this is what Americans are fighting and paying for today) and a “homeland” for Jews with Commonwealth status, the “Imperial Federalism” for which Rhodes, Milner, Toynbee, and the dozens of notables in their groups tirelessly pushed. It is the forerunner of the World Security State run by an Anglo-American elite that has expanded to become multi-cultural and ecumenical in the worst ways.

They will never let Israel become sovereign because its Federal System and principle of the higher law of G-d was the basis for the American Republic that now is anathema. 

A last word on Mexico, Americans and the chief Oligarch’s signal omissions: he did not mention the executive orders and agreements with foreign heads of state to merge the American Social Security System with that of Mexico (save Social Security?!), to erase borders and create a North American Union subdivided into regions each with its own capital.

Regarding the interminable War on Terror, that is, the war on the truly free peoples of the world, let us recall that Bertrand Russell stated that “a scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government” (1953). Russell who our teachers and media told us was a great pacifist wrote that “war has been disappointing in controlling population, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective.” Jacques Cousteau, who had his own TV show promoting love of porpoises and coral reefs told UNESCO that “the world’s population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people a day” (1991). The Club of Rome, entwined with many “environmental” groups agrees that “the real enemy is humanity” (1991).

We’ve been reviewing some of the latest official lies and the agenda their smiling, surface of applause hides like froth hides a jagged reef. The latest State of the Union is another piece of evidence that the oligarchs, not surprisingly, favor the pyramid over the Temple Mount, the United Nations over the covenant of Sinai, favor death over life. “Another possible surrogate for war [in reducing population] is the reintroduction of slavery, consistent with modern technology and political processes” like the mass media (“Report from Iron Mountain,” 1966).

The War on Terror is perfect for this purpose; jihad is the ultimate bacillus or virus; it needs only to be fed which the oligarchs of many nations arrange to do and “the war system” and security measures insure that population control arrives on its white or should one write, pale horse.

Whatever you do, blame it all on the Jews and make sure to keep them from settling their land, especially its holiest places. Be like Hadrian, the “most Greek” of the Roman Emperors who put the name “Palestina” onto Israel. Because if Jews did settle their heartland it might produce real instead of rhetorical freedom, honorable humility rather than pride, and genuine peace rather than peace processes.

The oligarchy always will prefer the pyramid to the citizen farmer and his inalienable plot of land; will prefer debt-supported fiat money to fair weights and measures (the shekel is both a coin and specific weight). So Israel must go; the process of erasure begins and ends in corruption of language, thought and heart. As Orwell wrote, “the past was erased, the erasure was forgotten; the lie became truth.” That’s the State of the Union as we move toward a regionalized world system and reintroduction of slavery.