Archive for the 'articles' Category

Sports, Distraction, and a Borderless World

Wednesday, August 15th, 2007

Comte, Blavatsky, Bailey, Crowley, Marx, Wells et al spoke of the Hierarchs or the Party or the “enlightened ones” - die eigene - who could dance with the devil as Mick Jagger, a useful tool of those fashioning the World Security state sang in “Dancing with Mr. D.” As the maneuvers and emplacement of the World Council of the World Religion and its geo-political end game becomes more overt, the hierarchs increasingly need to keep the masses distracted and sad. To do this, more and more people are driven for solace to sports which become increasingly degraded into the cult of goddess rapture and the general loss of norms, standards and skills that pervades culture, distinguishing our twilight times. The trap has been pre-set and is being sprung. (more…)

The Unmentioned Parallel to the Duke Rape Case

Sunday, May 6th, 2007

The storm of the Duke Rape case has subsided. Unless there is an after-shock should district attorney Mike Nifong be indicted rather than chastised, — an empty rebuke — the enormous significance of this matter will be buried by tomorrow’s catastrophes and absurdities. But beyond the reverse racism and victim feminism at Duke, there is one major area of American life that went unmentioned throughout the saga: the routine, vicious, and family-destroying methods of the divorce industry and courts, methods and biases that have been destroying lives for profit for thirty-five years.

Read carefully because more than the damage done to the students at Duke the injustices and damage of the Divorce Industry tear out the heart of our Constitutional Republic and of the relationships of trust, honor, tradition, teaching and honesty at its core.

We also will consider why the torrent or media coverage missed or buried the connection between the injustices at Duke and the divorce industry. (more…)

Prisoners, Friends and Enemies

Sunday, April 8th, 2007

For two weeks, in late March and early April 2007 fifteen British navy personnel received intense media coverage after being snatched from the Persian Gulf by an Iranian boat. Iran paraded the prisoners before cameras for rehearsed apologies which created outrage in America and even in Britain. Since the British were close to but apparently not in Iranian waters their abduction was an act of war (recall the Barbary pirates) and their treatment violated international laws protecting prisoners. But England’s fellow EU states, obligated by law to come to her defense, looked away. Their commerce with Iran, principally Germany whose $6.2 billion in bank-credits backed ultimately by German tax payers supports German corporations in Iran and covers Iran’s trade deficit with Europe left their governments indifferent to the prisoners’ and to the issues at stake. Eurabia strikes again. 

And after all, Britain has betrayed them many times, not least into the partitions, financial deals and surrenders that triggered WW II. 

Perhaps this is part of the wages of the ”war on terror.” After all, are we at war with Iran? Their leaders often say that they are at war with us while our leaders engage in extended diplomatic processes of obscure design. It seems that what Joseph Conrad called “the flabby, weak-eyed, pretending devil of rapacious and pitiless folly” has struck again; has moved in, perhaps for the duration… (more…)

Gulf War III is Coming

Sunday, March 11th, 2007

Ancient history is intersecting with the end game of post-modern Globalism. The financial-diplomatic-intelligence and industrial cadres that use the politicians as their masks and whose goal is a regionalized world system ruled by a few major ‘communities of interest’ are nearing a showdown with Iran. Shiite apocalyptics ensure the date will be kept.

The overweening tycoons that rule our civilization media, politics are in bed with the competing leaders of jihad, also a system of global hegemony that never will cohere (witness the Sunni - Shiite bloodbath of thirteen centuries). In this marriage made for hell, both the Emperor and Empress are naked. (more…)

Friday, March 9th, 2007

 

Anomalies of the Post-War World Explained

Wednesday, March 7th, 2007

Geopolitical initiatives, alliances overt and disguised, finance, trade, wars great, small and interminable are bewildering — if one follows the explanations proffered by major media and government spokespersons; this is what Orwell meant by “Newspeak.” Still, there is one character that makes sense of this scrambled alphabet, a key to the madness of a seemingly brain-damaged world: a war on the Jews.

To deflect demands and undermine efforts to rescue Jews from Europe during the Shoah, the British and American governments in January 1943 began referring to themselves and their few allies as the “United Nations” and emphasizing that one of the goals of the post-War world would be to punish those involved in “crimes against humanity”: as if to signal a trend, Jews rarely were mentioned as the major victims of such crimes. There were more demands from influential publications and people for a “world government” that would prevent war, a council of democracies that would work to promote democracy.

Some anomalies: Russia, run by a small and brutal oligarchy financed in no small part of American and British capital (and later weapons and food) was not only invited to the United Nations but onto its Security Council where it enjoyed, as one of the elite five, veto power over all and any resolutions. Russia’s oligarchy did, however, desire world government to enhance control of resources, just as did the Rockefeller and similar interests. As for preventing wars: from 1946-9 the Russians turned the nations of eastern Europe into colonies; the Arab states, none of them democracies attacked Israel with the avowed intention of finishing the holocaust which some of them now say never happened. “Israel is not a state and therefore cannot be invaded” said a Brit diplomat in a perfect demonstration of the Newspeak Orwell despised. And indeed, Israel was not a state prior to May 14, 1948 because the British Round Table – RIIA had decided that it would not be one and, when push came to shove, would not get commonwealth status, either. That was held for the Arab Federation now termed the New Middle East. Shimon Peres is perennial point person within Israeli government for this nightmare. (more…)